Archive for the 'Computers' Category

Jul 01 2008

Fun with Red Box

Published by nate under Computers

About a month ago, when McDonald’s debuted their new chicken breakfast sandwich, I caved and bought one. I didn’t really want one, and it wasn’t any good, but I’m a sucker for their marketing. I mean, the iconic scenes of young twenty-somethings playing basketball, gorging on fast food on a park bench really move me. See, I had to buy one. I had to. OK, I lied: I had two.

The chicken sandwhiches came with these free movie rental coupons, redeemable at “Red Box”. I’m sure you’ve seen these, they’re these movie-store-in-a-vending-machine things. I assume they’re a fairly recent invention, I started seeing them a year ago or so. I guess it’s true what they say: “Necessity is the mother of invention.”

Anyway, I went to redeem them the other day (I watched “The Bucket List”, thanks for asking) and I found out about a fun little trick. Here’s what you do:

Step 1: Select your movie, and press the checkout button.

Step 2: Swipe your credit card.

Step 3: It will ask you for your e-mail address.

Step 4: Swipe your credit card again.

Step 5: Enjoy.

The text box where you’re supposed to enter your e-mail address will reveal all of the information contained in your credit card’s magnetic strip.


Back to the Blog >>

One response so far

May 25 2008

Wilsonville Search Engine Optimization

Published by nate under Computers

I’ve been keeping busy in my off hours by consulting with a local Search Engine Optimization specialty firm.  AuraDev, a web design and web marketing company, has been helping local clients in the Portland, Oregon metro area by building and growing their web presences, and ultimately growing their clients’ bottom lines.  I’ve been helping with a few of my special super-marketer talents: keyword building, dynamic content generation, and web marketing strategizing.

This has been keeping me busy.  That’s not an excuse; just an explanation.  If you miss me, you can always hire me through AuraDev.

2 responses so far

May 12 2008

Everything I needed, I learned at the airport…

Published by nate under Air Travel, Annoyances, Computers

I’m back at the airport for my third flight of the month. I’m starting to recognize airport personnel and other frequent travelers. This probably indicates that my flights are delayed too often, at least more so than it indicates that I’m observant by nature.

Passing through security this morning I learned two things: 1) it’s ok to bring CPAP machines through the security checkpoint, but you have to take it out of your bag just like you would a laptop, and 2) apparently there is some doubt among TSA employees as to whether X-rays can pass through neoprene (wet suit material).

Perhaps I’m just being rude (it’s been known to happen), but at 5:00 am, I would prefer as little discussion and commotion as possible as I proceed through the understaffed security checkpoint. The overly awake “greeter” (a new feature I’ve noticed at the security point at PDX) loudly gives the same instructions as the monitor placed directly overhead. (Remember 3-1-1 to speed my screening process.) One of her instructions is to please take out any laptops, video recorders, or CPAP machines out and place them in a bin for security screening. CPAP Machines? Is it really that common to travel with CPAP machines that we need to announce this? I’m a reasonably intelligent guy, and I had no idea what this was until I looked it up on Wikipedia. So they can’t be that common. And at 5:00 in the morning, we probably don’t need to announce this in our “outside voices”.

So I’m undressing into the grey plastic bins to be run through the X-ray machine. My normal routine is to pull my laptop out of its neoprene case (more like a sleeve, really) and place the laptop on top of the case in the bin. It’s a new laptop, and I’d really hate to get it scratched up as bad as my old laptop. I’ve been going through this exact same routine on every flight since March, when I bought my fancy new laptop. Today an overzealous and underinformed (the worst possible combination) TSA agent stops me and says that the computer must go through by itself. These guys don’t have the easiest job (although that’s mostly their fault, IMO), but nevertheless, I feel obliged to point out that I’d really rather not have my new laptop resting directly on the rickety old grey plastic bin, and would prefer, instead, to have it resting on my case. I have, as I patiently pointed out, complied with instructions by removing it from my baggage and by passing it through in its own bin. At this point, the gentleman (if he can be called that) argues that the the X-ray machine might have trouble passing through the case, and that they need to get a good look.

Ok, so I’m no radiological technician, but it seems pretty clear to me that X-rays can pass through neoprene. Especially if they can pass through cheap grey plastic bins. And especially considering that unless I miss my guess, the X-rays don’t pass through from the bottom of the machine, through the conveyor belt, but rather from the top or sides. You know, the part where the big tunnel is… Hey, I could be wrong, I’ll admit that. But it seems like a pretty stupid way to design the machine. Which would make sense if the TSA agent designed it. But I’m guessing he didn’t. I started to point this out, but I thought to myself, “Fuck it, it’s just a Dell.”

On a side note, I find myself getting frustrated with a lot of people. Usually it’s at their place of employment, when I’m forced to interface with them. Call me a terrible person, because you’re right, but I always take solace in one thing: They have reached the absolute pinnacle of their career. And here they are: bagging groceries, waving traffic signs, or in this case, repeating the phrase “please remove your shoes and place them in a grey plastic bin to run through the X-ray machine.” (It’s a good thing I don’t wear neoprene shoes…)

2 responses so far

Apr 01 2008

Computerese

Published by nate under Computers

I got a new laptop a small, which are thrilled with. I got a new laptop this month, which I’m thrilled with. Everything about it has been great so far. Everything about it has been great so far. I’m running as the business on it, in His windows speech recognition built into it. I’m running Vista Business on it, and it has Windows Speech Recognition built into it. Apparently also as a built in microphone. Apparently it also has a built-in microphone. About this on a pretty cool sorcerer looking into it. I thought this sounded pretty cool so I started looking into it. The way it’s supposed to work, is a just talked, it’ll take dictations, we can give commands and it will open or close windows, forcible actions parentheses but SEM e-mails) call and basically remove the need to manually a track with. The way it’s supposed to work, is that you just talk, and it will take dictations, or you can give commands and it will open or close windows, perform simple actions (like sending e-mails), and basically remove the need to manually interact with it. It sounds a little works. It sounds a lot better than it works. I spent two days trying to ‘train” Into my voice, but apparently opposed the computerese. I’ve spent two days trying to “train” it to my voice, but apparently I don’t speak computerese. Which, I guess, is actually not so surprising. Which, I guess, is actually not so surprising. At first I sing the problem was with me. At first I assumed the problem was with me. AVI mobile, ATF for Nancy Xiong. Maybe I mumble, maybe I have poor enunciation. Maybe I need to speak more loudly cynical or maybe less lovely. Maybe I need to speak more loudly; or maybe less loudly. But, I think I figured out. But, I think I’ve figured it out. But computerese retarded. My computer is retarded.

It seems strange to me that we had yet been able to create computers which can speed was selected human. It seems strange to me that we haven’t yet been able to create computers which can speak and listen like a human. It seems like a 040 can do it, we should be able to make a Computer Data. It seems like if a four-year-old can do it, we should be able to make a computer do it. I mean, we have computers parallel parking cars these days, and flying planes, and doing other complicated things. I mean, we have computers parallel parking cars these days, and flying planes, and doing other complicated things. Why don’t teach them to listen? Why can’t we teach them to listen?

I envision the Star-Trekish future, Oregon and the computer to get me a brief summary of news articles of interest to me. I envision this Star-Trekish future, where I demand the computer to give me a brief summary of news articles of interest to me. Aparently of all bring while much shorter attention span, I imagine. My highly evolved brain will have a much shorter attention span, I imagine. It seems to be the way we’re going. It seems to be the way we’re going. Ultimately, though, I vote for this whole speech recognition thing to work, just like to be Lazier. Ultimately, though, I’d love for this whole speech recognition thing to work, just so I could be lazier. Sitting in for a lot of computer typing has become too typical, too strenuous. Sitting in front of a computer typing has become too difficult, too strenuous. I want a Welsh. I want to lounge. I want my spoken word to controlling every attraction. I want my spoken word to control my every interaction. I want to conquer the world of sound of my voice! I want to conquer the world with the sound of my voice!

Unfortunately, for now, it looks like we’ll just have to keep typing. Unfortunately, for now, it looks like I’ll just have to keep typing.

2 responses so far

Mar 17 2008

WoW is Crack.

Published by nate under Computers

World of WarcraftEqualsCrack Cocaine

5 responses so far

Dec 13 2007

Google Gadget Patch

Published by nate under Computers

After I made my Google Gadget (see Google Gadget Post), Google sent me a patch (or badge, or emblem, or as I like to call it: a mark of honor). It looked like this:

Google Desktop Developer Patch

I’m so grateful for my free patch that I can’t decide whether to affix it to a vest, sash, or “Jack Bauer Man-Bag”.

Vest

Girlie Sash

Jack Bauer Man Bag

What do you think? Vote by e-mailing me at either vest@yankeetag.com, sash@yankeetag.com, or bauerbag@yankeetag.com

2 responses so far

Dec 10 2007

nightmare scenario

Published by nate under Annoyances, Computers

Comcast, the only true high-speed internet option in my area, is not an option for me. There are two reasons for this:

  1. Comcast gave my name and information to some copyright protection group working for the TV networks, because I downloaded one episode of the Office, and one episode of House, M.D. through torrents. I hate Comcast, and will not use them.
  2. Also, they don’t offer service at my address.

So I didn’t really want to use Comcast, but not having high-speed internet just might kill me. Oh, and before I forget, Qwest: stop telling people you offer highspeed. 1.5 Mbps is not high speed. That’s not any kind of speed. That sucks.

So, I’m going to have slow internet. At least until somebody invents a way to make Comcast not suck, or for Qwest to go fast.

3 responses so far

Nov 19 2007

Brand New Project

Published by nate under Computers, Humor

I’m working on a new project with St.Ofle called Spamoscope. The idea stems from a blog by St.Ofle describing his use of those garbled, gibberish spam messages we all get. You know the ones that don’t even seem to be selling anything? The idea is that they are, in fact, useful as a horoscope of sorts. A Spamoscope. Check daily.

No responses yet

Nov 19 2007

You are George Mason

Published by nate under Annoyances, Computers

So it seems like it’s taking forever for 24 to resume. Come November/December I’m usually chomping at the bit, but even more so this year, since last season basically sucked. I spent this morning searching google for Jack Bauer pictures (which I find myself doing more often than I should for a straight male…). I stumbled across one of those surveys like “Which Power Ranger are you?” or “Which LOTR character are you?” etc. This one was which 24 character are you? I ended up being the best character second only to Jack Bauer himself:

You are George Mason

George Mason, what a guy. Speaking of which, I really need to brush up on seasons one and two.

No responses yet

Nov 13 2007

Sexy Cop Lingo Part Deux

Published by nate under Computers, Humor

I just found out I’m ranked number 1 on Yahoo! for the phrase: “sexy cop lingo” now, too. Check it out: me on Yahoo!

I’ve really begun to question the practicality of search engine placement logic.

One response so far

Next »